Fragmentation of governmental action in the public policies of the "SENDA" on the treatment and prevention of drug use in the province of Llanquihue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/GP6-7FABR20007Keywords:
Fragmentation, governmental action, public policiesAbstract
Fragmentation within the State is a process that arises under the auspices of the New Public Management, a model that brought with it a modernizing reform of public institutions, having as its central idea the extrapolation of management and organizational models from the private sector to the public sector to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the State Administration. As a direct consequence of this, government action also began to fragment, that is, reducing a public policy into different converging programs to solve a single public problem. Although this may not be a problem, in fact, it could be perceived as positive in theoretical terms, it has been proved that in practice this excessive specificity of public problems – especially complex ones – end up not being solved and preventing them from being solved in a comprehensive way. In this sense, in the case of public policies related to drugs, is possible to describe a series of characteristics associated with the fragmentation of government action that are present in the public policies on treatment and prevention of drug consumption implemented by SENDA in the Province of Llanquihue could be described
Downloads
References
Cejudo, G. M., (2016). La fragmentación de la acción gubernamental: Intervenciones parciales frente a problemas complejos. CIDE, 2.
Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (24 de febrero de 2015). Coherencia y políticas públicas, Metas, Instrumentos y Poblaciones Objetivo. Gestión y Política Pública, XXV (1), 3-31. Obtenido de https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/gpp/v25n1/v25n1a1.pdf
DIPRES. (2017). Informe Final: Evaluación de resultados de los programas de tratamiento y rehabilitación del Servicio Nacional para la prevención y rehabilitación del consumo de drogas y alcohol, SENDA. Centro de Estudios Justicia y Sociedad, Instituto de Sociología UC (ISUC). Obtenido de https://justiciaysociedad.uc.cl/wp content/uploads/2022/05/articles214466_informe_final3-1.pdf
Farhang, S., & Yaver, M. (2016). Divided government and fragmentation of American Law. Midwest political science association (MPSA), 401-417.
Franco, F. (2017). La fragmentación del estado en Chile. Revista Latinoamericana de Políticas y Acción Pública, 48.
Head, B. (2008). Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101-118.
Irarrázaval, I. y De Los Ríos, B. (2014). Monitoreo y evaluación de políticas públicas Contribuciones de la experiencia internacional para la institucionalidad chilena. Notas Públicas. Santiago de Chile: Centro UC de Políticas Públicas. En Haefner, C., & Villegas, X. (2019). Evaluación de programas públicos. Análisis del desempeño global de programas gubernamentales en Chile. Revista de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos, 17.
Kingdon, J. W. (2014). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Londres: Pearson Education.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia. (2019). MONITOREO Y SEGUIMIENTO OFERTA PÚBLICA 2019: SERVICIO NACIONAL PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y REHABILITACIÓN DEL CONSUMO DE DROGAS Y ALCOHOL. Obtenido de https://www.dipres.gob.cl/597/articles 206690_doc_pdf.pdf
OEA. (2013). El problema de las drogas en las Américas. Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA).
Peters, B. G. The Politics of Tools Choice. En Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A guide to the New Governance. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and society, 36(3), 385-396. Obtenido de https://watermark.silverchair.com/14494035.2017.1361633.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAvMwggLvBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggLgMIIC3AIBADCCAtUGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMnMTE6Vk9wFpreuLAgEQgIICppxfqdiARpGiLFMqnnEBhXCznaNszfTsr
Pineda de Alcázar, M. (2007). El pensamiento teórico y crítico en tiempos de complejidad incertidumbre en las ciencias de la comunicación. Scielo. Obtenido de: http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-52162007000400008
Pollit, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled Government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. Londres: Routledge.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 155 169.
Sampieri., R. H., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. México D.F.: McGRAW-HILL.
Seddon, T. (2010). A History of drugs: drugs and freedom in the liberal age. New York: Routledge.
SENDA. (2021). Estrategia Nacional de Drogas 2021-2030. Para un Chile que Elige Vivir sin Drogas. Santiago: Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública.
SENDA. (2021). Manual para implementar la modernización de SENDA Previene. Santiago: Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública.
UNODC. (2008). A Century of international drug control. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
VanThiel, S. (2022). Research Methods in Public Administration and Public Management. Nueva York: Routledge.
Verschuere, B. (2009). The Role of Public Agencies in the policy making process. Public Policy and Administration, 24(1), 23-46. Doi: HTTPs://doi.org/10.1177/0952076708097907
Verschuere, B., & Vancopenolle, D. (2012). Policy making in an era of agencification: An exploration of task divisions between politicians, core departments and public agencies. Policy and Society (31), 249-258.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Belén Barrientos Álvarez, Rodrigo Tapia Díaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
