NEGOTIATING EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES IN THE COLLECTIVE SPHERE.

SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CHILEAN CASE

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Díaz Pazos Mg. Derecho Laboral - Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29393/RD253-4INJD10004

Keywords:

Negotiating equality, equality of parties, Labour collective rights, freedom of association, collective bargaining, Protective principle, Primacy of reality

Abstract

There is consensus regarding the inequality of power when it is the worker who confronts his employer. However, there is no consensus on inequality when it is the workers union that is the interlocutor, since there are various doctrinal and jurisprudential views that place the parties on an equal footing. Such an understanding, of course, must be scrutinized in light of the particularities of the Chilean collective law system. Bearing in mind that, after this research, the existence of equality of bargaining between the parties in Chile is ruled out, this paper focuses on investigating about such consideration of balance, the origin of the scrutinized phenomenon, the context in which the equality approach could occur, how this context doesn't exist in our legal and constitutional system, the negative and positive consequences of the application of one or the other understanding, as well as a tentative solution consistent with our legal and factual system and reality. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Díaz Pazos, J. C. (2023). NEGOTIATING EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES IN THE COLLECTIVE SPHERE.: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CHILEAN CASE. University of Concepción Law Review, 91(253), 93 - 117. https://doi.org/10.29393/RD253-4INJD10004

Issue

Section

Artículos