NOTES ON THE LOSS OF THE OBJECT IN THE THIRD ENVIRONMENTAL COURT.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLES 17 N° 6 AND 17 N°8 OF LAW N° 20.600 FROM A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/RD252-9NSGF20009Keywords:
Loss of the object, right to appeal, effective access to justice, environmental general action for judicial review, environmental permits, annulmentAbstract
The Third Environmental Court, applying the theory of improper invalidation, has understood that the closing rule of Article 17 N° 8 of Law No. 20,600 is not applicable to the appeal for invalidation. Thus, it is possible according to this court jurisprudence, that with respect to the same Environmental Qualification Resolution, different appeals for its nullity may be filed. In this paper we will specifically address the relationship between the articles 17 No. 6 and 17 No. 8 appeals, together with a critical analysis of the proposed solution that the Third Environmental Court has upheld. This solution consists in the fact that once a declaration of nullity has been obtained with respect to one of the actions, the other, initiated in a different proceeding, would superveniently lose its object, since it is pursuing a nullity that has already been declared.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Luciano R. González Matamala, Agustín Fuentes Berríos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
User may share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially; and adapt, remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, all this with the obligation to give appropriate credit to the author. You can find more information at the following link.