ABSENCE OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND INDIGENOUS CONSULTATION ON HYDROBIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AS A CAUSE FOR REJECTION OF GAS PIPELINE PROJECT
COMMENTS ON RULING No. R-6-2020 OF THE THIRD ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/RD256-11APSI30011Keywords:
Active Legal standing, Environmental Impact Assessment, Indigenous consultation, Citizen participation, Chilean Environmental Court's case lawAbstract
This case commentary analyzes the omission of consultation of indigenous people when adverse effects on natural renewable resources of hydrobiological nature are effective sources of food for members of these indigenous people. When the judicial appeal was accepted, it was funded directly in the violation of standards of the indigenous consultation, the way of life and the legitimation of the indigenous consultation and indirectly in the accomplishment of the indigenous consultation procedure.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Sergio Peña Neira, Patricio Araya Meza, Ignacio Canales D'arcangeli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
User may share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially; and adapt, remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, all this with the obligation to give appropriate credit to the author. You can find more information at the following link.
