DUAL NATURE OF THE PURPOSE FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT IN THE OFFENSE OF CANNABIS SATIVA CULTIVATION
JUSTIFICATION DEFENSE AND LEGAL PRESUMPTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/RD257-8CMRV10008Keywords:
cannabis sativa, justification defense, legal presumption (criminal law), medical treatment, Law No. 20.000 (Chile), Therapeutic cultivationAbstract
This article examines the justification defense introduced by Law N° 21.575 in relation to the criminal offense of unlawful cultivation of Cannabis sativa when intended for therapeutic purposes. It provides an in-depth analysis of the dual nature of the provision, which simultaneously establishes a substantive justification and a legal presumption aimed at facilitating evidentiary assessment in judicial proceedings. The text further identifies interpretive challenges, warning against both overly permissive applications that may lead to de facto decriminalization, and excessively restrictive readings that could render the therapeutic exception ineffective. The article concludes by underscoring the necessity of a systematic interpretation consistent with foundational principles of criminal law—one that appropriately balances legal certainty with the right to health, while preserving clear and well-defined boundaries for therapeutic self-cultivation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Manuel Esteban Rodríguez Vega

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
User may share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially; and adapt, remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, all this with the obligation to give appropriate credit to the author. You can find more information at the following link.



