THE INTERPRETATIVE PROBLEMS OF ARTICLE 27 OF LAW 18.216. A PROPOSAL FROM THE PURPOSES OF PENALTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/RD258-7PIOM10007Keywords:
Execution of penalty, Breach (of penalty), Revocation of penalty, Substitute penalties, Purposes of sentenceAbstract
During the execution of substitute penalties, a series of discussions arise regarding the application of the institution of breach contemplated in article 27 of Law 18.216, discussions that can be addressed and eventually resolved on the basis of an interpretation of the norm from the purposes of the penalty that underlie this regulation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcos David Olivos Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
User may share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially; and adapt, remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, all this with the obligation to give appropriate credit to the author. You can find more information at the following link.



