Security performance measurement systems for local governments
Intergovernmental performance measurement frameworks for local coercive capacities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/GP8-2SGML30002Keywords:
state capacities, performance management systems, local coercive capacities, local governmentAbstract
This article seeks to identify the characteristics of intergovernmental performance measurement schemes that evaluate local government capacities in managing security and coexistence, aiming to propose a performance measurement framework for subnational governments in Colombia. National and federal governments require performance measurement tools for local governments that provide objective instruments for intergovernmental relations. These schemes are developed in a context where the securitization of public agendas coincides with the increasing role of subnational governments in managing security and coexistence under the conceptual frameworks of citizen and human security. Latin America faces a security and coexistence crisis while also struggling to transition from performance measurement schemes for local governments to performance management systems. This challenge is even greater when measuring capacities related to security and coexistence. International experiences in measuring local government capacities in managing security and coexistence reveal a mismatch between the measurement objectives, which are reflected in dimensions aiming to comprehensively address local security problems (such as contexts of inequality and poverty, community participation, or respect for human rights), and the measurements expressed through indicators that focus on the traditional perspective of outcomes related to criminal behavior and high-impact crimes
Downloads
References
Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Performance Measurement in Local Government: A Literature Review and Case Study of Practices. Public Performance & Management Review.
Angulo, R., Ariza, D., Bateman, A., Gómez, N., González, J. I., Pérez, J., Ramírez, J. M., Rojas, F., Ruíz, M. J., Sánchez, F. & Sepúlveda, C. (2018). Medición del desempeño municipal: hacia una gestión orientada a resultados. Documentos CEDE No. 38.
Avellaneda, C. (2009). Municipal Performance: Does Mayoral Quality Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (2), April, 285–312.
Avellaneda, C. (2023). What Works in Latin American municipalities? Assessing local government performance. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
Balán, P. E. (2015). El Estado en la Ciencia Social Moderna: Conceptos, mediciones, indagación causal. Estudios Sociales del Estado, 1(1), 205-236.
Bardan, P. & Mookherjee, D. (2006). The Rise of Local Governments: An Overview. In Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Pranab Bardhan and Dilip Mookherjee. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Barrera, J. (1998). Radar. Resultados del Proceso de Descentralización Educativa en las Entidades Territoriales Certificadas. Misión Social, DNP.
Becker, A., Chica, C., & Cardenas, M. (2003). Ordenamiento territorial. Reivindicación de la descentralización para el desarrollo. GTZ, Fescol.
Behn, R. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review 55(4), 313–324.
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
Bello-Gomez, Ricardo A., & Avellaneda, C. (2023). Goal Achievement in Municipal Strategic Planning: The Role of Executives Background and Political Context. Public Administration Review, 83(5), 1088–1107.
Blodgett, T. & Newfarmer, G. (1996). Performance measurement: (arguably) the hottest topic in government today. Public Management 78(1).
Bonet, J. (2006). Fiscal Descentralization and Regional Income Disparities: Evidence from the Colombian Experience. Annals of Regional Science, 40, 661-676.
Bouckaert, G. & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing Performance: International Comparisons. London: Routledge.
Bucheli, J. F., Balanzó, A., Méndez, P., Moyano Suaza, F., Marriner, K., Montilla, P. J., Ortiz, D., Rojas, H. & Sastoque, E. (2021). Evaluación de desempeño para una gestión pública efectiva: parámetros, desafíos y recomendaciones.
Coleman, T. G. (2012). A Model for Improving the Strategic Measurement and Management of Policing: The Police Organizational Performance Index (POPI). University of Regina.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2002). Evaluación de la Descentralización Municipal en Colombia: Balance de una Década. Marco Conceptual y Resultado de Progreso Municipal, vol 1. Dirección de Desarrollo Territorial, DNP.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2018a). Nueva Medición de Desempeño Municipal MDM. (Boletín no. 1).
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2018b). Nueva Medición de Desempeño Municipal MDM. (Boletín no. 2).
Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2024). Guía de orientaciones para realizar la medición del desempeño de las entidades territoriales, vigencia 2023.
Duncan, G. (2006). Los señores de la guerra: De paramilitares, mafiosos y autodefensas en Colombia. Planeta, 368 pp.
Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring Federalism. University of Alabama Press.
Elias, N. (2001). El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. (R. García Cotarelo, Trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2001, p. 581. 968-163-011-4.
Escobar-Lemmon, M., & Ross, A. D. (2014). Does Decentralization Improve Perceptions of Accountability? Attitudinal Evidence from Colombia. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 175–188.
Gao, J. (2015a). Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from Research Evidence. Public Administration and Development. 35, 86–96 pp.
Gao J. (2015b). Pernicious Manipulation of Performance Measures in China’s Cadre Evaluation System. The China Quarterly, (223), 618-637. doi:10.1017/S0305741015000806.
Gao, J. (2016). Bypass the Lying Mouths: How Does the CCP Tackle Information Distortion at Local Levels? The China Quarterly, (228), 950-969.
Gao, J. (2020). Mitigating pernicious gaming in performance management in China: Dilemmas, strategies and challenges. Public Performance & Management Review 44(2), 321-351.
Gilio, A. (2016). Desarrollo de capacidades estatales para gobiernos locales: dimensiones e indicadores para su diagnóstico. Revista Reforma y Democracia, (66), 228-258.
Giraldo, J., Rendón, A. J. y Duncan G. (2014). Nuevas modalidades de captación de rentas ilegales en Medellín. Medellín. ESU –Universidad EAFIT – Alcaldía de Medellín.
González, J. I. (2011). Reflexiones sobre las mediciones del desempeño municipal. Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
González, J. I., & Angulo, R. (2017). Revisión y validación de la propuesta de modificación de la metodología de medición de desempeño integral municipal.
Grodzins, M. (1966). The American System: A New View of Government in the United States (D. Elazar, ed.). Rand McNally.
Halligan, J. (2021). Contradictions in implementing performance management. In A. PODGER, M. DE PERCY, & S. VINCENT (Eds.), Politics, Policy and Public Administration in Theory and Practice: Essays in honour of Professor John Wanna (1st ed., pp. 105–132). ANU Press de Cultura Económica.
Hanson, J. K. & Sigman, R. (2011). Measuring state capacity: Assessing and testing the options. Ponencia presentada en la Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Hanson, J. K. & Sigman, R. (2020). Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring State Capacity for Comparative Political Research. Journal of Politics.
Hatry, H. P. (1980). Performance Measurement Principles and Techniques: An Overview for Local Government. Public Productivity Review, 4(4), 312-339.
Jackson, J. & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 4(3), pp. 241-248.
Johnsen, A. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money & Management, 25(1), 9–17.
Luna, J. P. & Feldmann, A. E. (2012). Mapeando las interacciones entre desafiantes y agentes estatales en América Latina contemporánea, Lasa Forum XLIII, 4(23).
Maguire, E. R. & Johnson, D. (2010). Measuring public perceptions of the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(4), 703-730.
Maguire, E.R. (2003). Measuring the Performance of Law Enforcement Agencies. CALEA Update Magazine, (83).
Maslov, A. (2015). Measuring the Performance of the Police: The Perspective of the Public.
Mastrofski, S. (1999). Policing for people, Paper presented at the third Ideas in American.
Mesa, J. (2015). El concepto de seguridad. Un análisis a partir de los enfoques de la seguridad pública, la seguridad ciudadana y la seguridad humana. En Casas-Casas, A. & Giraldo-Ramírez, J. Ed. (2015) Seguridad y convivencia en Medellín. Aproximaciones empíricas a sus desafíos y atributos. Alcaldía de Medellín & CAP-Universidad EAFIT.
Moore, M.H. & Braga, A.A. (2003). "Measuring and improving police performance: the lessons of Compstat and its progeny", Policing: An International Journal, 26 (3), 439-453.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Georgetown University Press.
Noordegraaf, M. (2008). Meanings of measurement: the real story behind the Rotterdam safety index. Public Management Review, 10(2), 221–239.
OECD. (1995). Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing.
Pinzón-Villa, M. Agudelo, L.F. & Leyva, S. (2024). Medirlo todo para que todo siga igual. El alcance de los esquemas de medición del desempeño de los Gobiernos locales en América Latina. En Prensa.
Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Little Brown. In Filippov, M. (2005) Riker and Federalism. Constit Polit Econ. (16), 93–111.
Riker, W. H. (1969). Six books in search of a subject or does federalism exist and does it matter? Comparative Politics, 2(1), 135–146.
Rodas-Gaiter, A & Sanabria-Pulido, P. (2020). Management, goal, alignment, and performance assessment legitimacy: Evidence from the Colombian public sector. Public Administration Issues, (5), 81-104. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2020-0-5-81-104.
Rodríguez-Hernández, J. E. (2013). El Sistema de evaluación del desempeño laboral en Colombia: un caso de alta formalización con baja institucionalización. Administración & Desarrollo, 42(58), 19-38.
Sanger, M. (2008). From Measurement to Management: Breaking through the Barriers to State and Local Performance. Public Administration Review. 70-S86.
Théret, B. (2019). Regímenes económicos del orden político. Editorial Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Thomas, P. G. (2006). Performance Measurement, Reporting, Obstacles and Accountability: Recent Trends and Future Directions. ANU Press.
Vignieri, V. (2018). Performance Management in the Public Sector. In A. Farazmand (Ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1-8). Springer.
Wang, X. (2002). Assessing Performance Measurement Impact. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(1), 26-43. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643685.
Weber, M. (2008). Max Weber’s complete writings on academic and political vocations (J. Dreijmanis, Ed.; G. C. Wells, Trans.). Algora Publishing.
Zapata, J., Acosta, O., & Gonzalez, A. (s.f.). Evaluación de la Descentralización Municipal en Colombia ¿Se consolidó la sostenibilidad fiscal de los municipios Colombianos durante los años noventa? Archivos de Economía, (165).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Santiago Leyva Botero, Mariana Pinzón-Villa, Luis Fernando Agudelo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
