La Metaphysical indeterminacy as determinability: the case of the Cyrenaics

Authors

  • Bruno Borge Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET
  • Giovanna De Paoli Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29393/CF42-8IMBG20008

Keywords:

Metaphysical indeterminacy, Determinables and determinates, Cyrenaic school, Ancient ontology, Jessica Wilson

Abstract

This work applies Jessica Wilson’s metaphysical indeterminacy approach, based on the determinable-determinate distinction, to ancient ontologies, focusing on the Cyrenaic school. It argues that this conceptual framework elucidates the nature of indeterminacy in Cyrenaic metaphysics, complementing and resolving tensions in Ugo Zillioli’s interpretation. The study reviews the contemporary debate on metaphysical indeterminacy, presents Wilson’s approach and its applications, and applies it to ancient ontologies, particularly the Cyrenaic school. It discusses the conceptual and interpretative advantages of this application, contributing to a deeper understanding of Cyrenaic metaphysics within the context of indeterminacy ontologies in ancient philosophy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Literatura primaria

Giannantoni, G. (Ed.). (1990). Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae (Vols. 1-4). Bibliopolis.

Mársico, C. (Ed.). (2013). Filósofos socráticos: Testimonios y fragmentos. I. Megáricos y cirenaicos. Losada.

Plutarch. (1985). Moralia, Volume XIV (F. C. Babbitt, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Literatura secundaria

Akiba, K. (2014a). A defense of indeterminate distinctness. Synthese, 191(15), 3557–3573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0485-3

Barnes, E. (2010). Arguments against metaphysical indeterminacy and vagueness. Philosophy Compass, 5(11), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00348.x

Barnes, E. (2014). Fundamental indeterminacy. Analytic Philosophy, 55(4), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12049

Bett, R. (2000). Pyrrho, his antecedents, and his legacy. In R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient scepticism (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press.

Caie, M. (2014). Metasemantics and metaphysical indeterminacy. In A. Burgess & B. Sherman (Eds.), Metasemantics: New essays on the foundations of meaning (pp. 55–96). Oxford University Press.

Calosi, C. (2022). Quantum modal indeterminacy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 95, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.08.007

Calosi, C., & Wilson, J. (2018). Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy. Philosophical Studies, 176(10), 2599–2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1140-5

Darby, G. (2010). Quantum mechanics and metaphysical indeterminacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903097786

Darby, G., & Pickup, M. (2021). The reality of ontic vagueness and quantum indeterminacy. Synthese, 199(3-4), 10727–10748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03260-y

Dieks, D., & Vermaas, P. E. (Eds.). (1998). The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Springer.

Di Frisco, E. (2018). Processes. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-philosophy/

Dummett, M. (1975). Wang's paradox. Synthese, 30(3-4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485048

Dupré, J., & Nicholson, D. J. (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In D. J. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 3–46). Oxford University Press.

Eklund, M. (2008). Deconstructing ontological vagueness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 38(1), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.0.0009

Heller, M. (1996). Against metaphysical vagueness. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216243

Horgan, T. (1994). Robust vagueness and the forced march sorites paradox. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 159–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214167

Horgan, T. (1995). Metaphysical indeterminacy and mental causation. Erkenntnis, 43(1), 73–95.

Hudson, H. (2001). A materialist metaphysics of the human person. Cornell University Press.

Lee, M. K. (2010). Antecedents in early Greek philosophy. In R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient scepticism (pp. 13–35). Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell.

Lombardi, O., & Ardenghi, J. S. (2022). Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-modal/

Lombardi, O., & Castagnino, M. (2008). A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39(4), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.04.005

Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., & Ardenghi, J. S. (2010). The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics as a kind of 'atomic' interpretation. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1086/656541

Merricks, T. (2001). Varieties of vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00047.x

Morreau, M. (2002). What vague objects are like. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(7), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/3655626

Osborne, C. (2004). Empedocles recycled. The Classical Quarterly, 54(2), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/54.2.380

Parsons, T. (2000). Indeterminate identity: Metaphysics and semantics. Clarendon Press.

Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism. Oxford University Press.

Sider, T. (2003). Against vague existence. Philosophical Studies, 114(1-2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024472113662

Taylor, D. E., & Burgess, A. (2015). What in the world is semantic indeterminacy? Analytic Philosophy, 56(4), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12070

Torza, A. (2020). Indeterminacy in the world. Cambridge University Press.

Tsouna, V. K. (1998). The epistemology of the Cyrenaic school. Cambridge University Press.

Warren, J. (Ed.). (2014). The Cyrenaics. Acumen.

Weatherson, B. (2003). Many many problems. Philosophical Quarterly, 53(213), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00328

Wilson, J. M. (2013). A determinable-based account of metaphysical indeterminacy. Inquiry, 56(4), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.816251

Wolff, J. (2015). Metaphysical indeterminacy and worldly incompleteness: The case from quantum mechanics. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2(10), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.010

Zilioli, U. (2012). The Cyrenaics. Acumen.

Zilioli, U. (2024). Eliminativism in ancient philosophy: Greek and Buddhist philosophers on material objects. Bloomsbury Academic.

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Borge, B., & De Paoli, G. (2024). La Metaphysical indeterminacy as determinability: the case of the Cyrenaics. Journal of Philosophy, (42), 187 - 204. https://doi.org/10.29393/CF42-8IMBG20008