Trasfondo disciplinar y lenguaje de la teoría
Relación de la imagen de mundo con la estratificación conceptual del lenguaje científico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29393/CF43-1TDNL10001Palabras clave:
Trasfondo disciplinar, Imagen de mundo, Lenguaje objeto de la teoría, Esquema conceptual, Estratificación del lenguajeResumen
¿Qué son las teorías científicas? La concepción dual afirma que estas se constituyen de un componente lingüístico (lenguaje objeto) y de uno estructural no-lingüístico (el trasfondo disciplinar). No obstante, este esquema resulta limitado. La relación entre el trasfondo y el lenguaje de la teoría es caracterizada de modo puramente formal, por lo que no se va más allá de este aspecto. Mi objetivo es establecer una analogía entre el trasfondo disciplinar y la idea de imagen de mundo (Weltbild) de Wittgenstein para explicar de cómo el trasfondo de la práctica científica determina su lenguaje.
Descargas
Citas
Andreas, H. (2010). Semantic holism and scientific language. Philosophy of Science, 77(4), 524-543. https://doi.org/10.1086/656007
Baghramian, M., & Carter, J. A. (2022). Relativism. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/relativism/
Bohr, A., & Mottelson, B. (1969). Nuclear structure: Volume I. A. W. Benjamin, Inc.
Brown, G. E. (1959). Foundations of the optical model for nuclei and direct interaction. Reviews of Modern Physics, 31(4), 893-919.
Coliva, A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, certainty and common sense. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook, N. (2010). Models of the atomic nucleus. Springer.
De la Peña, L. (2019). Introducción a la mecánica cuántica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Dereniak, E., & Dereniak, T. (2008). Geometrical and trigonometric optics. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Feigl, H. (1970). The ‘orthodox’ view of theories: Remarks in defense as well as critique. En M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 3–16). University of Minnesota Press.
Ferrer, A. (2015). Física nuclear y de partículas. Universitat de València.
Feshbach, H., Porter, C. E., & Weisskopf, V. F. (1954). Model for nuclear reactions with neutrons. Physical Review, 96(2), 448-464.
French, S. (2020). There are no such things as theories. Oxford University Press.
Frigg, R. (2022). Models and theories: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003257625
Gamow, G. (1937). Structure of atomic nuclei and nuclear transformations. Clarendon Press.
Glanzberg, M. (2021). Truth. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/truth/
Glock, H.-J. (Ed.). (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell.
Goeppert-Mayer, M. G., & Jensen, J. H. D. (1955). Elementary theory of nuclear shell structure. John Wiley & Sons.
Gustafsson, M., Vakili, I., Bayer Keskin, S. E., Sjöberg, D., & Larsson, C. (2012). Optical theorem and forward scattering sum rule for periodic structures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 60(8), 3818-3826. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2201113
Halvorson, H. (2012). What scientific theories could not be. Philosophy of Science, 79, 183–206.
Hamilton, A. (2014). Wittgenstein and on certainty. Routledge.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press.
Heilbron, J. L. (2018). The history of physics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Heyde, K. (1994). The nuclear shell model. Springer-Verlag.
Hodgson, P. R. (1994). The nucleon optical model. World Scientific.
Kaal, J. E., Sorensen, J. A., Otte, A., & Emming, J. G. (2021). The nature of the atom: An introduction to the structured atom model. Curtis Press.
Kim, Y. R., Kim, Y. J., Zubarev, A. L., & Yoon, J. (1997). Optical theorem formulation of low-energy nuclear reactions. Physical Review C, 55(2), 801-809.
Kotarbi?ski, T. (1966). Gnosiology: The scientific approach to the theory of knowledge. Pergamon Press. (Obra original publicada en 1929)
Kuhn, T. S. (2015). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Obra original publicada en 1970)
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (N. W. Storer, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Moulines, C. U. (1989). ¿Hay una filosofía de la ciencia en el último Wittgenstein? Theoria, 4(11), 327-342.
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Nersessian, N. J. (1984). Faraday’s field concept. En N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories (pp. 175-187). Martinus Nijhoff.
Nersessian, N. J. (1987). A cognitive-historical approach to meaning in scientific theories. En N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science: Contemporary philosophical approaches to understanding scientific practice (pp. 161-177). Martinus Nijhoff.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. MIT Press.
Nersessian, N. J., & Andersen, H. (2000). Nomic concepts, frames, and conceptual change.Philosophy of Science, 67, 224-241. http://www.jstor.org/stable/188670
Ortiz, C. (2020). Sobre la verdad y la nobleza de la ciencia. En H. Poincaré, La ciencia y la moral (pp. 7-19). Fe de Ratas.
Poincaré, H. (1895). Analysis situs. Journal de l’École Polytechnique, 1(2), 1-121.
Portides, D. (2017). Models and theories. En L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Springer handbook of model-based science (pp. 25-47). Springer.
Rayleigh, L. (1871). On the light from the sky, its polarization and color. Philosophical Magazine, 41, 107-120.
Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of ? and ? particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, 21(125), 669-688.
Savage, C. W. (1990). Preface. En C. W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories (pp. vii-ix). University of Minnesota Press.
Suppe, F. (1974). The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press.
Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to logic. Van Nostrand.
Suppes, P. (1967). What is a scientific theory? En S. Morgenbesser (Ed.), Philosophy of science today (pp. 55-67). Basic Books.
Tarski, A. (1956). Logic, semantics, metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938 (2ª ed.). Hackett.
Toulmin, S. (1953). The philosophy of science. Hutchinson.
Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. Hutchinson.
Verlet, L., & Gavoret, J. (1958). On the optical model for nuclear reactions. Il Nuovo Cimento, 10(3), 505-519.
Verlet, L. (1958). On the optical model for nuclear reactions. Il Nuovo Cimento, 7(6), 821-828.
Vorms, M. (2018). Theories and models. En A. Barberousse, D. Bonnay & M. Cozic (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 171–224). Oxford University Press.
Winther, R. G. (2021). The structure of scientific theories. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/structure-scientific-theories/
Wittgenstein, L. (2017). Investigaciones filosóficas. Gredos. (Obra original publicada en 1953)
Wittgenstein, L. (2022). Sobre la certeza. Gedisa. (Obra original publicada en 1969)
Zarnikhi, A. (2005). Language development and scientific development: A case study of physics terminology creation in Persian. Terminology, 11(2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.11.2.05zar
Publicado
Número
Sección
Derechos de autor 2026 Nibaldo Lorca Améstica
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
