O'Higgins and San Martín: convergence of times and projects. Conjunctural, political and spatial divergences

Authors

  • Eduardo Cavieres Figueroa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29393/RH28-27OSEC10027

Keywords:

Republic-monarchy, national americanist hero vs americanist hero, Nation state vs American Confederation

Abstract

Was O'Higgins only a national hero? Indeed, in terms of his military and political actions, he is, but in terms of his doctrinary education and his Americanist will, his role in the history of the American emancipation process projects him far beyond the limits of the Republic to which he gave birth. Undoubtedly, his political ideology, republicanist and Americanist, made him a front-line independence hero, but was, from the perspective of the historiography, restricted to the country to which he dedicated his greatest efforts. This meant that he took up arms at the right time and left them when exercising the magistracy of the State to which he gave life. He did not pretend to go further but was willing to add sacrifices to the Independence of Peru. The liberating expedition was a joint work with San Martin that united them under a single goal but put them apart in relation to the form of government to be established there. Neither the friendship that united him with San Martin, nor the respect he had for him, dissuaded him from opting for the monarchy instead of the Republic. O'Higgins was the American hero by principle and conviction: National Republics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Cavieres Figueroa, E. . (2021). O’Higgins and San Martín: convergence of times and projects. Conjunctural, political and spatial divergences. Revista De Historia, 2(28), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.29393/RH28-27OSEC10027

Issue

Section

Artículos