VALIDATION OF SUBJECTIVE MENTAL WORKLOAD SCALE IN ACADEMICS STAFF

Authors

  • PAULA CEBALLOS VÁSQUEZ Universidad Católica del Maule. Talca, Chile.
  • TATIANA PARAVIC KLIJN Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile.
  • MÓNICA BURGOS MORENO Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile.
  • OMAR BARRIGA Universidad de Concepción. Concepción, Chile.

Keywords:

Validity, reproducibility of results, occupational health, occupational health nursing, mental workload

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Subjective Mental Workload Scale (SMWS). Materials and methods: the sample of this study consisted of 56 persons of both genders, obtained through a census of the staff of two faculties of a Chilean university, who answered the Subjective Mental Workload Scale and the psychosocial risks evaluation questionnaire. The reliability was verified by Cronbach alpha coefficient, for the validity of content, the scale was checked by ad hoc experts. Constructo validity was evaluated by factorial analysis with Varimax rotation, and the criterion validity was measured when the results of the scale were correlated with the validated instrument SUSESO-ISTAS 21. Results: the multidimensional structure of the scale was confirmed, with a suitable reliability (_=0.79), the criterion validity by factorial analysis, and the constructo validity by Pearson correlation. Conclusion: SMWS is indicated as a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the Mental Workload Perception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-08-08

How to Cite

1.
CEBALLOS VÁSQUEZ P, PARAVIC KLIJN T, BURGOS MORENO M, BARRIGA O. VALIDATION OF SUBJECTIVE MENTAL WORKLOAD SCALE IN ACADEMICS STAFF. Cienc enferm [Internet]. 2014Aug.8 [cited 2024May18];20(2):73-82. Available from: https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/cienciayenfermeria/article/view/8689

Issue

Section

Investigaciones